Ad Familiares 6.6
Ad Familiares 6.6
Headnote
Cicero to Aulus Caecina, written at Rome around the kalends of October 46 BC (Perseus: Romae circ. K. Oct. a. 708 (46)). Caecina, son of the Caecina whom Cicero had defended in 69 BC (the Pro Caecina), was a man of the Etruscan nobility whose family had long preserved the disciplina Etrusca of haruspicy; he was himself a learned antiquarian. In the late fifties and early forties he had circulated an anti-Caesarian pamphlet — the Querelae (“Complaints”) — and after Pharsalus he remained in exile, more dangerous to Caesar than the other Pompeians for that pamphlet’s sake. He was now in Sicily, waiting on Cicero’s mediation. The letter is the substantive piece of the small Caecina cluster (Fam. 6.5–8), longer and politically more candid than its companions, and the closest register-cousin in this group to Fam. 6.14 to Ligarius of late November.
The body is built as a public augury. Cicero, the official augur, takes up Caecina’s own Etruscan disciplina and answers it with his own: since Caecina’s haruspical reading once divined Cicero’s restoration from exile correctly, Cicero will now divine Caecina’s. The augury proper occupies §§ 7–11. It runs along two paths, in the regular augural manner: one drawn from Caesar’s character (mild, clement, drawn to talent, swayed by united constituencies — and Etruria will move united for Caecina), the other from the nature of the times (Caesar has restored Cassius, Brutus, Sulpicius, and even Marcellus with whom he had been angriest; the logic of the present settlement will not permit men of clean record to remain shut out while men condemned of nameless crimes have already returned). The praise of Caesar in §§ 9–10 is the most candid piece of public-private overlap on Caesar’s likely course that Cicero allows himself in the autumn of 46 — not flattery, but the policy reading on which the petition for Caecina rests.
Two passages bear special weight. In § 6 Cicero quotes the tragic Amphiaraus on himself — prudens et sciens ad pestem ante oculos positam — to describe his own going out to the Pompeian war: knowing the outcome, foreseeing the ruin, and going anyway, defeated not by hope but by shame at the prospect of failing Pompey. In § 8 the praise of Caecina’s Querelae as expressing Caesar’s own mitis clemensque natura is a delicate piece of misdirection: the pamphlet had attacked Caesar, but Cicero recasts it as a portrait of the very clemency Caesar should now show its author. The closing promise (§ 13) that Cicero’s standing with Caesar grows daily, and that whatever weight he has with him will be spent on Caecina, is the substantive offer behind the augury.