Ad Atticum 1.17
Ad Atticum 1.17
Headnote
Cicero to Atticus, written at Rome on the Nones (5) of December 61 BC. The first long letter of the Pomponia quarrel: Atticus, on his way back from Epirus, has sent Cicero copies of letters from his brother Quintus, the proconsul of Asia, complaining about Pomponia (Atticus’s sister) — letters that show “a great variety of feeling and an unlikeness of opinion and judgment.” Quintus and Pomponia’s marriage, brokered by Cicero seven years before, is fraying for the first time on the record. Cicero answers in the central register of the corpus’s domestic dimension (§1–7): he has long known something was wrong; he had hoped Atticus would meet Quintus on the road and mend it in person but the meeting did not happen; he asks Atticus to be the soft party and to receive Quintus’s “mildness of nature ready to take and to lay down offence” in good faith.
The second half of the letter (§8–11) is the political news. The senate has just promulgated, by its own decree, an inquiry against equestrian judges who took bribes in the Clodius trial; the equestrian order is incensed, threatening to break with the senate. Cicero has opposed the inquiry from the floor and saved the day. Then the publicans who had taken the Asian tax-farm at too high a price (Crassus pushing) ask the senate to release them from the contract; Cicero, swallowing his judgment of the demand (“an invidious matter, a base demand, a confession of rashness”), throws his weight behind them too, lest the equestrian order be lost to the senate altogether. The matter awaits a final speech from Cato, “that hero of ours,” who is about to make the speech that, in fact, will sink the publicans’ suit and break Cicero’s policy. The closing sentence about Pompey is the new strategic axis: “I have a most familiar use of Pompey. I see what you would say. I shall guard against what is to be guarded against, and shall write to you on another occasion more about my counsels.” The First Triumvirate is forming underground; Cicero’s “concord of the orders” is its political opponent.